B.A. M.A. (Concordia), Ph.D. (Trent)
Thesis: From Negation to Affirmation: Witnessing the Empty Tomb in the Era of Forensic Scientific Testimony
Examining Committee:
Ihor Junyk (Supervisor), Jonathan Bordo, Tomislav Pletenac
External Examiner: Randy Innes, Federal Department of Heritage
Internal Examiner: John Milloy
Chair: David Holdsworth
Abstract
Forensic scientific practice is conventionally understood as a solution to absence. With every technological advance the power and span of the archive grows and with it revives hopes of uncovering facts and locate bodies that might put genocide denial and/or negationism to rest. Destruction, however, continues to define the reality and conditions for testimony in the aftermath of mass atrocity. This means that even as forensic scientific practice grows in its capacity to presence that which was previously unpresentable, destruction and the concomitant destruction of archive require that we consider what it means to remember with and without the archive alike. This dissertation explores the impact of forensic science on cultural memory through a choice of two case studies (set in Kosovo and Srebrenica respectively) where forensic scientific methods were involved in the investigation of atrocities that were openly denied. This dissertation makes an agnostic argument that the biblical example of the empty tomb can serve as a paradigm to understand the terms of witnessing and testifying to absence in the era of forensic scientific investigations. Specifically, it posits the following theses with regards to the empty tomb: it is a structure and an event that emerges at the intersection of forensic science’s dual property as an indexical technique and as a witness function, it cannot be validated through historiographic or forensic scientific methods (it is un-decidable) and as such serves as a corrective the fantasy of the total archive, is represented in the contemporary genre of forensic landscape; and because it breaks with the forensic imperative, it compels alternative uses for testimony and memorial practices that need not be defined by melancholia as it can accommodate forms of testimony that are joyous and life affirming.
Rachel E. Cyr is the recipient of the prestigious Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship. Her doctoral research interrogates the implications of forensic scientific practice to evidentiary regimes of memory and testimony. Her work is informed by and speaks to critical topography, semiotic and information theory, rhetoric of science, and philosophies of history.