Search the Library Catalogue Search Library Resources Library Forms About the Library Library Help Library Home

 

Research Guides by Subject: Nursing - Evaluating Information

Evaluating Web sites

Below is a list of questions to ask yourself when evaluating web sites. For further information, please see the Library's guide on Evaluating Web sites.

Authority

Is the author's name (or the name of the organization responsible for the document) clearly stated?

If the author is identified, is he or she a professional or accredited authority on the subject?

If not, does the author state his/her perspective on the subject. For example, by saying "I'm a cancer survivor," or "I've used chiropractors for 10 years"?

If an organization is responsible for the information, is it a reputable organization recognized as an authority on the subject?

If medical information is given by a non-professional, is this clearly said?

What kinds of evidence are provided to endorse a specific treatment or service? Keep in mind that scientific studies and research have a different credibility than first-hand experience.

Does the site provide contact information about the author (for example, full name, address, phone number, e-mail address)?

 

Audience

Is intended audience indicated?

Is content appropriate for target audience?

Is presentation (e.g. reading level) appropriate for target audience?

 

Coverage

Does the content discuss the issue(s) you're interested in?

Does it match what you are looking for?

Is there enough detail or does the information seem superficial?

Is the information presented within a Canadian context?

 

Accuracy

Does the site have original content or does it only link to other sites and do these sites work?

Is the information presented cited?

Based on what you know already know, or have checked in other sources, does the information seem accurate and credible?

Does the text follow basic rules of grammar, spelling and composition?

 

Currency

Is the information reviewed and/or updated often enough given the content? For example, if it deals with the latest in safety features on child car seats, has it been changed lately?

Is the date of the last update clearly marked on each item or screen?

If information is only valid for a short time, is this fact clearly labeled?

 

Objectivity

Is the author's interest and/or mandate in developing and sharing this information clear? For example, is a non-profit organization trying to promote exercise and active living or is a fitness product company trying to sell you exercise equipment?

Is there potential for bias or conflict of interest? For example, is a company telling you that only their product or service is valuable?

Are both (or all) sides of the issue presented?

If not, does the resource state that it presents only one side of an issue? For example, a site that promotes a vegetarian diet should indicate that there are other dietary options, or clearly state that they are only presenting one side of a multifaceted issue.

Are commercial links and/or sponsorships clearly stated?

Are these sponsorships separate from the health information content?

If the site collects or requests information about you, do they tell you exactly why they want this information?

Are their privacy guidelines stated?

If you have to register to use the site, is the reason clear and your privacy ensured?

Does the site offer a clear statement that health information should not be taken as health advice or a substitute for visiting a health professional?

If there are fees associated with use of the resources on the site, are they clearly explained?

 

Adapted from the Canadian Health Network www.canadian-health-network.ca/

Getting Started
Finding Books
Finding Journal Articles
Finding Health Statistics
Evaluating Information Websites
Writing
Citing
Back to Nursing Subject Guide (Main Page)

 

Top of page.
Last Modified: September 10, 2007
Maintained by , Thomas J. Bata Library.