Below is a list of questions to ask yourself when evaluating web sites. For further information, please see the Library's guide on Evaluating Web sites.
Authority |
Is the author's name (or the name of the organization responsible for the document) clearly stated? |
If the author is identified, is he or she a professional or accredited authority on the subject? |
If not, does the author state his/her perspective on the subject. For example, by saying "I'm a cancer survivor," or "I've used chiropractors for 10 years"? |
If an organization is responsible for the information, is it a reputable organization recognized as an authority on the subject? |
If medical information is given by a non-professional, is this clearly said? |
What kinds of evidence are provided to endorse a specific treatment or service? Keep in mind that scientific studies and research have a different credibility than first-hand experience. |
Does the site provide contact information about the author (for example, full name, address, phone number, e-mail address)? |
| |
Audience |
Is intended audience indicated? |
Is content appropriate for target audience? |
Is presentation (e.g. reading level) appropriate for target audience? |
| |
Coverage |
Does the content discuss the issue(s) you're interested in? |
Does it match what you are looking for? |
Is there enough detail or does the information seem superficial? |
Is the information presented within a Canadian context? |
| |
Accuracy |
Does the site have original content or does it only link to other sites and do these sites work? |
Is the information presented cited? |
Based on what you know already know, or have checked in other sources, does the information seem accurate and credible? |
Does the text follow basic rules of grammar, spelling and composition? |
| |
Currency |
Is the information reviewed and/or updated often enough given the content? For example, if it deals with the latest in safety features on child car seats, has it been changed lately? |
Is the date of the last update clearly marked on each item or screen? |
If information is only valid for a short time, is this fact clearly labeled? |
| |
Objectivity |
Is the author's interest and/or mandate in developing and sharing this information clear? For example, is a non-profit organization trying to promote exercise and active living or is a fitness product company trying to sell you exercise equipment? |
Is there potential for bias or conflict of interest? For example, is a company telling you that only their product or service is valuable? |
Are both (or all) sides of the issue presented? |
If not, does the resource state that it presents only one side of an issue? For example, a site that promotes a vegetarian diet should indicate that there are other dietary options, or clearly state that they are only presenting one side of a multifaceted issue. |
Are commercial links and/or sponsorships clearly stated? |
Are these sponsorships separate from the health information content? |
If the site collects or requests information about you, do they tell you exactly why they want this information? |
Are their privacy guidelines stated? |
If you have to register to use the site, is the reason clear and your privacy ensured? |
Does the site offer a clear statement that health information should not be taken as health advice or a substitute for visiting a health professional? |
If there are fees associated with use of the resources on the site, are they clearly explained? |
| |
Adapted from the Canadian Health Network www.canadian-health-network.ca/ |